5 Comments
Jul 19, 2021Liked by Ned Donovan

Very interesting article. Reminds me of Paul Scott’s novels about partition. The issue of the princely state at partition integral to the plot of the last of the quartet

Expand full comment

A factual error in an otherwise fine article. It is true that Maharaja Hari Singh of Jammu & Kashmir did not accede to India on August 47 (at the time of partition of India). However, he signed the formal letter of accession to India in October that year, when the new state of Pakistan tried to annex J&K by force.

Expand full comment

Just a quick correction, the Mughal kings were not a foreign empire like the British empire, but a fully integrated part of the Indian society they ruled over for almost 800 years. Like the British, they were initially invaders, but unlike the British empire on which the sun finally set one dominion at a time, the Mughals became part and parcel of the Indian society they integrated with

Expand full comment